Best US Stock Tips

Posts Tagged ‘Which’

All the buzz in News (blog)

Hindenburg Omen: In a Market Crash, Which Consumer Stock to Play? TheStreet.com Hennessy Funds' Frank Ingarra noted that a major pullback in the stock market would create a "great" buying opportunity for the top consumer stocks, … Hindenburg OmenFOXNews Just what the stock market didn't need: A Hindenburg sightingLos Angeles Times (blog) Late San Diegan Created Name of Market Disaster OmenSan Diego Reader Consumer Affairs -American Conservative Magazine (blog) -NASDAQ all 81 news articles »

stock market – Google News

TopNews United Kingdom (blog)

Health-care law faces test as regulators settle which plans must do what Washington Post In keeping with President Obama's promise that you can hold on to your insurance if you like it, the new law exempts existing health … Young adult children can stay on parents' policiesRichmond Times Dispatch Health Care Reform: Who will benefit in Arizona?Tucson Citizen Keeping your adult kids on your health planMarketWatch Tulsa World -TopNews United States -UPI.com all 22 news articles »

Insurance – Google News

like etrade ive read charges 7.5% for the stock you buy.. are there any other sites that charge less.. ??

please and thank you..

i would like to invest in companies that are listed in the SGX but can not find a broker in the U.S that provides such service.

I am 15 and looking to open an online brokerage account where I can buy/sell stocks. I am looking for a broker that has none or very little minimum requirements in regards with how much money you have to put into your account to open it. I have seen accounts that only let you open them for 10K… My range is $0.00-$200.00. I am also looking for an online brokerage where there are NO hidden fees and each trade costs somewhere from $0.00-$10.00 MAX.

Thank you and please help!

I currently use Scottrade which as a whole I like because of its simplicity. I trade with a cash account and Im not interested in getting involved with a margin account or anything like that. I like to keep things simple.

A very limiting factor with Scottrade is the 3 days you need to wait until your funds settle after selling a stock. You can buy again but you cant sell until the funds have been settled. (well you can but you arnt supposed to)

Are there other brokers with a shorter settling period?

it could be anywhere in the world but preferably USA

Hi as in India now there is so Much of spurt in investment I am often confused between equity & mutual funds Now when I have finally decided to go for MF over Equity I am again baffled by so many MF schemes . Can anybody please guide me what are the fine points to ask from the Asset Management Company offering the MF scheme ?

recieved a call a couple of months ago, May 5, from someone at BasicInvestors in New York telling me to buy a stock call Agfeed, cymbol FEED. They told me it would double in two months because it is the biggest company in China. The stock has lost half it value. The broker insists that I buy more on margin to ‘double down’ then the stock went down again and I got a margin call and was told I had to sell some shares. I did that and I recieved another call telling me I had to sell more share, which I did. Then I got a letter that said the clearing house had sold me out. I was basicaly charged three times commission to sell shares that I was talked into buying. I have lost half my money and this broker keeps telling me to buy more.

I call FINRA and they say they look into it. I started looking for lawyer and found the lawyers Shepherd Smith & Edwards, LLP have a whole page about the crooks at Basic Investors and even have Basic Investors Complaint and Legal Claims Center.
They say that Basic Investors of NY was fined $25,000

FINRA Reports
Reporting Source: Regulator
Allegations: SEC RULES 11AC1-4, 15C2-11, NASD RULES 2110, 3010, 4632, 4642, 6620,
6740 – BASIC INVESTORS, INC. FAILED TO DISPLAY IMMEDIATELY
CUSTOMER LIMIT ORDERS IN LISTED SECURITIES IN ITS PUBLIC
QUOTATION, WHEN EACH SUCH ORDER WAS AT A PRICE THAT WOULD
HAVE IMPROVED THE FIRM’S BID OR OFFER IN EACH SUCH SECURITY; OR
WHEN THE ORDER WAS PRICED EQUAL TO THE FIRM’S BID OR OFFER
AND THE NATIONAL BEST BID OR OFFER FOR EACH SUCH SECURITY, AND
THE SIZE OF THE ORDER REPRESENTED MORE THAN A DE MINIMIS CHANGE IN RELATION TO THE SIZE ASSOCIATED WITH THE FIRM’S BID OR
OFFER IN EACH SUCH SECURITY; THE FIRM INCORRECTLY REPORTED TO
THE NASDAQ MARKET CENTER (NMC) THE SECOND LEG OF “RISKLESS”
PRINCIPAL TRANSCTION(S) IN NNM SECURITIES; “RISKLESS PRINCIPAL
TRANSACTIONS IN SMALLCAP SECURITIES; “RISKLESS” PRINCIPAL
TRANSACTION(S) IN OTC SECURITIES BECAUSE IT INCORRECTLY
DESIGNATED THE CAPACITY OF SUCH TRANSACTION(S) AS “PRINCIPAL.”
THE FIRM PUBLISHED QUOTATIONS FOR OTC EQUITY SECURITIES OR
NON-EXCHANGE-LISTED SECURITIES OR, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY,
SUBMITTED SUCH QUOTATIONS FOR PUBLICATION IN A QUOTATION
MEDIUM, THE PINK SHEETS, AND DID NOT HAVE IN ITS RECORDS THE
DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED BY SEC RULE 15C2-11(A)(”PARAGRAPH (A)
INFORMATION”); DID NOT HAVE A REASONABLE BASIS UNDER THE
CIRCUMSTANCES FOR BELIEVING THE PARAGRAPH(A) INFORMATION WAS
ACCURATE IN ALL MATERIAL ASPECTS; AND DID NOT HAVE A
REASONABLE BASIS UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES FOR BELIEVING THAT
THE SOURCES OF THE PARAGRAPH (A) INFORMATION WERE RELIABLE.
THE QUOTATIONS DID NOT REPRESENT A CUSTOMER’S INDICATION OF
UNSOLICITED INTEREST. FOR EACH OF THESE QUOTATIONS, THE FIRM
FAILED TO FILE A FORM 211 WITH NASD AT LEAST THREE BUSINESS DAYS
BEFORE ITS QUOTATIONS WERE PUBLISHED OR DISPLAYED IN A
QUOTATION MEDIUM. [CONTINUED IN COMMENTS.]
Date Initiated: 05/03/2007
Docket/Case Number: 20050003265-01
Resolution Date: 05/03/2007
Sanctions Ordered: Censure
Monetary/Fine $25,000.00
Other Sanctions Ordered: UNDERTAKING
Sanction Details: WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED
TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS;
THEREFORE, THE FIRM IS CENSURED, FINED $25,000 AND REQUIRED TO
REVISE THE FIRM’S WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES REGARDING
COMPLIANCE WITH DISCLOSURE OF ORDER EXECUTION INFORMATION,
RISKLESS PRINCIPAL TRADE REPORTING, SALES IN THRESHOLD
SECURITIES, BOOKS AND RECORDS, THE QUOTATION OF
NON-EXCHANGE-LISTED SECURITIES, AND BID TEST COMPLIANCE
REQUIREMENTS WITHIN 30 BUSINESS DAYS OF ACCEPTANCE OF THIS
AWC BY THE NAC.
Summary: THE FIRM’S SUPERVISORY SYSTEM DID NOT PROVIDE FOR SUPERVISION
REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE
SECURITIES LAWS, REGULATIONS, AND NASD RULES CONCERNING
COMPLIANCE WITH DISCLOSURE OF ORDER EXECUTION INFORMATION,
RISKLESS PRINCIPAL TRADE REPORTING, SALES IN THRESHOLD
SECURITIES, BOOKS AND RECORDS, AND THE QUOTATION OF
NON-EXCHANGE-LISTED SECURITIES. THE FIRM FAILED TO PROVIDE
DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE THAT IT PERFORMED THE SUPERVISORY
REVIEWS SET FORTH IN ITS WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES
CONCERNING THE REQUREMENTS OF BID TEST COMPLIANCE DURING A
MONTH.

Should I hire this law firm? They seem to know all about the crooks that took my money at Basic Investors but I do not know how good they are as lawyers? Do anyone know this firm? I have never had to get lawyer for something likek this before.

thanks for help